We are suddenly getting pointing update failures under a clear sky. A sample image is attached, Log read like this: 03:04:56 ==== Starting target New Observation 1030 ==== 03:04:56 ACPS Observation New Observation 1030(1 of 1) 03:04:56 (belongs to Project Wilson_Tests, Plan AR AIR Exposure tests) 03:04:56 (turning on sidereal tracking) 03:04:56 Pointing updates are enabled 03:04:56 Catalog Maximum Mag = 18.0 03:04:56 Start slew to New Observation 1030... 03:04:58 Start rotate to PA 0.0 deg (raw rotator angle 186.0) 03:04:58 (wait for slew to complete) 03:05:42 (slew complete) 03:05:42 [flip check: Tn=360s HAc=-12871s GW=F HAz=-12510s DWz=F WF=no] 03:05:42 Updating pointing... 03:05:42 (taking 16 sec. exposure, Luminance filter, binning = 2) 03:05:42 (using High Gain StackPro readout mode) 03:05:42 (starting exposure) 03:06:01 (exposure complete) 03:06:03 (exposure complete and image downloaded) 03:06:03 Calibrating image... 03:06:04 **Calibration failed. Original image saved. 03:06:04 **MaxIm reports No suitable calibration groups were found. 03:06:05 Image finished 03:06:05 Plate-solve pointing image. 03:06:06 2 image stars found 03:06:06 922 catalog stars found 03:06:06 ** No matching stars found. Check your estimated center-point RA/Dec, and your image scaling and quality. 03:06:06 Start slew to offset... 03:06:07 (wait for slew to complete) 03:06:08 (slew complete) 03:06:08 (taking 16 sec. exposure, Luminance filter, binning = 2) 03:06:08 (using High Gain StackPro readout mode) 03:06:08 (starting exposure) 03:06:26 (exposure complete) 03:06:28 (exposure complete and image downloaded) 03:06:28 Calibrating image... 03:06:28 **Calibration failed. Original image saved. 03:06:28 **MaxIm reports No suitable calibration groups were found. 03:06:30 Image finished 03:06:30 Plate-solve pointing image. 03:06:30 2 image stars found 03:06:30 996 catalog stars found 03:06:30 ** No matching stars found. Check your estimated center-point RA/Dec, and your image scaling and quality. 03:06:30 Attempting all-sky plate solution (time-consuming)... 03:07:32 Failed: No matching stars found. Check your estimated center-point RA/Dec, and your image scaling and quality. 03:07:32 Astrometry.net may be offline or image quality is too poor. 03:07:32 Start slew to New Observation 1030... 03:07:33 (wait for slew to complete) 03:07:35 (slew complete) ACP console log closed 28-Nov-2023 03:07:35 UTC Please advise. Thanks
That is what we thought. It was the dark spots in the center of brighter stars that raised the question. How often would you expect to need to recharge it? We will need to obtain a spare unit and cycle it.
We recommend annual maintenance. Desert conditions may allow you to extend the period; high humidity locations perhaps 6-9 months. If you wish to purchase a spare, you can find it here: https://diffractionlimited.com/product/replacement-desiccant-plugs/ SKU: DESICCANT-STX-STL
Well, we were thinking this did not look like simple frost. It turns out it was a light case of frost over a rather extensive contamination of some sort that has appeared over time. The attached flats show a progression (June 8th, Sept. 28th, Oct. 10th). We have no idea where this could have come from or what it is, as the chamber has not been opened. This camera was sent in for warranty repairs of the temperature sensor last spring. Your thoughts, please.
Here is another set of images showing the whole frame. The left one is taken in red and the right in blue.
I am assisting Bruce with this issue. Attached is a photo of the camera sensor that shows residue on the sensor behind the chamber window. This photo was taken at room temperature. The camera may have been frosting, but this residue is not dew or frost and remains after the moisture dissipates.
I will invite you to look again at the picture I posted last of the whole chip. Frost would not form a pattern like that teardrop.
I have reviewed the images, as has Doug. When frost forms, it usually starts around a nucleus, and then it may leave the nuclei behind when it warms up. I disagree with your assessment of the teardrop not being attributable to moisture condensing on the surface of the sensor. It absolutely can look like this. Doug and I will discuss possible next steps and get back to you.
Colin, have you seen the photo I posted in post number 9 of this thread? There very well could have been moisture, but there is residue left behind after it evaporates.
Yes Danny. How long did you have the recharged desiccant plug in place? Typically it needs at least 24-48 hours to be effective.
Yes, of course. We thought there was frost in the first place, but it did not look like frost normally does. Several of us have had S-Big cameras and thus have experience with frost and desiccant recharging.
At this point, we have to figure out how to solve what has happened. Because this Aluma AC2020M-22011805 has a windowless back side illuminated sensor, removing contaminants is a clean room job. @Doug and I will get back to you.
Colin, the picture Danny posted is at room temperature. It is not frost. There is no cover over this chip. Can it be cleaned and how would one do that? Also, where did this come from? Was the camera opened when it was serviced?
Yes, the chamber was opened; however, we have a process to handle that safely with windowless sensors. A temporary sensor window is installed. During our (re)assembly process the camera is thoroughly baked out and the desiccant recharged. You should NEVER allow frost to build up like that on a windowless sensor. At the first sign of trouble you should stop operating it and immediately bake out the desiccant. Liquid on the sensor, which of course is what frost becomes when warmed up, is very bad! It can leave a slight residue, but far worse if the water is present for too long it will eventually corrode the sensor, which is of course permanent damage. Hopefully the water wasn't sitting on the sensor for a long period of time. It's a super delicate operation, but we can try to clean it.