NGC4244

Discussion in 'My Astrophotos' started by ROBERT T SCHAEFER JR, Apr 10, 2021.

  1. ROBERT T SCHAEFER JR

    ROBERT T SCHAEFER JR Cyanogen Customer

    Joined:
    May 13, 2018
    Messages:
    303
    152mm A+M Refractor(OfficinaStellare-1200mmF/L) and CanonEOSII RebelT7i modified UV-IR @ Hutech thru a TeleVue 2XPowerMate with 35mm T-Ring for an effect of 2400mmFL and an IDAS VLC-74 77mm 'light green/yellow tint' filter from Hutech . I did MaximDL Pro V6.16 RAWMonochrome Autosave Sequences from 67sec to 397secISO6400 for twenty-four images and in "Settings" for 'Files' I had 'checked' 'Save Data in Unsigned Format' . For the last three images I did 397secISO6400 and the first one I did as I normally do 'light' frames with 67secISO100 flush-frames between each 'light' frame ; the last two 397secISO6400 'light' frames I turned 'ON' the 'in-camera Long Exposure Noise Reduction' which took another 397sec to process in the RebelT7i before it downloaded to the laptop ... luckily the 'guiding' still keeps going . There are two other JPG's and one is a regular and the other has the 'in-camera Noise Reduction Enabled' and there is a difference around the edges which looks like the blur is removed .x

    {{{{{{{ I read somewhere that the Canon DSLR 'in-camera' 'Long Exposure Noise Reduction Enabled' will try to figure out the odd stray statistics in the processor which could be off-center light going into a pixel which might be bouncing off the Lens or Telescope sides and accumulating a blur which doesn't seem to be coming into the 'sensor' straight in from the Lens . It might even use a 'Bad Pixel Map' for some of the evaluation. Maybe a 120sec or 180sec exposure might be enough for straight in arriving photons and with exposures from 300sec and more the processor might be able to detect the stray accumulating light at the image's edges and internally remove it with the 'Long Exposure Noise Reduction Enabled' fully which takes awhile but it might be worth it in the long run . I will try it one night with a Canon Lens and a Hydrogen Alpha filter and for a 'Bad Pixel Map' in the RebelT7i I will do 120secISO6400 , and then do two 457secISO6400 regular 'light' frames and then do four or more 457secISO6400 'in-camera' 'Long Exposure Noise Reduction Enabled' fully which then downloads thru MaximDL Pro as RawMono 'light' frames and see if there is a noticable difference between the two different types ... if there is ... then that is a cure for the edge blurring that is difficult to remove .x }}}}}}} .x
     
  2. Colin Haig

    Colin Haig Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2014
    Messages:
    7,967
    Location:
    Earth
    The first image of the set seems best to me.
     

Share This Page